$217 Million Per Hour

As you may or may not know, I've taken a job with Health Care for America Now, an issue advocacy groups dedicated to winning real health care reform in 2009. Jerome has been kind enough to allow me to continue to post here on weekends on the topic of health care reform in America. Here's my pitch for the importance of this campaign.

$217 million per hour.

That's how much Americans spend on health care according to testimony in front of Congress' Joint Economic Committee by experts from the American Human Development Project.

24 hours a day. 365 days a year. For a total of almost $2 trillion spent every year, 16% of our GDP - more than any other nation on earth. And for what?

According to the World Health Organization, America ranks 37th in the world for best health care systems, behind countries we'd expect like France, Japan, and Norway, and also countries that might surprise you, like Colombia, Saudi Arabia, and Chile. And it's not just our health care. According to the American Human Development Project:

Despite the second-highest income in the world, despite being the the world's No. 1 economy, and despite spending $5.2 billion a day on healthcare -- more than any other nation -- America landed behind 11 other countries in overall human development [encompassing health, education, and income rankings].

One of the main problems was that one in six Americans don't have health insurance. That limitation is connected to such factors as lower life expectancy and higher infant mortality. The U.S. also has the highest percentage of children living in poverty of the 30 richest countries. The top 20% of income earners in the U.S. make 15 times more than the bottom 20%. And 14% of Americans lack the literary skills to understand newspaper articles or navigate instruction manuals. Those measures -- education, poverty, poor health and shorter lifespan -- have all been shown to be interconnected.


Health care is integral to our success as a country. Healthy children learn more. Healthy adults work more. A healthy population creates more prosperity for itself. And yet, while America spends more money on health care than everyone else, we get less. Over the years, as health insurance profits have risen (along with costs), Americans get less for their money. The ranks of not only the uninsured, but the underinsured are growing.

$217 million per hour, every day of every year.

Without adequate health insurance because premiums are rising much more quickly than both inflation and earnings, the number one cause of bankruptcy in America is health care costs.

Why do we put up with this? Why do we allow private insurance companies to reap ever-higher profits while fulfilling less and less of their obligations to cover our medical bills? Why do Americans continue to finance an industry that admits it puts profits before people, and is so is full of waste? As Ezra Klein puts it:

And of course, there's administration, where we pay $98 billion more than anyone else, $84 billion of it in oh-so-efficient private sector.  64% of those costs come from insurer underwriting and advertising -- in other words, we're paying more than $50 billion dollars so insurers can convince us we need care and then figure out how to deny those of us who'll actually use it.  That's some added value.

This system is broken. We deserve something better.

What if insurance companies were required to provide a standard level of care for a standard price? What if insurance companies couldn't drop you from their plans if you got sick? What if they couldn't deny you coverage if you had pre-existing conditions? And most importantly, what if there was a public health insurance plan anybody could opt into no matter what?

The distinguishing feature of America's health insurance system is its extreme privatization. While countries with public health insurance plans get more and pay less, America is forced to use its considerable wealth to pay for sub-par services.

$217 million per hour, day in and day out.

With America's education system in need of an overhaul, our roads and bridges crumbling, and the gap between our rich and poor widening, there are better things our government can be spending money on than padding pharmaceutical corporation's bottom lines, as they are doing with the advent of the new Medicare Part D laws. And with gas prices getting higher, electricity costs rising, and the dollar falling, there are better things the American people can be spending their money on than overpriced, under-performing private health care.

America was once known as a land of thrift. At the very least, let's try to be known as a land of smart consumers. We need a change. We need health care for America now!

We're going to get in in 2009, but we need your help. Please, join us!



Display:


Thank you for your efforts! (none / 0)

The best way we can improve health care in this country is through US Rep. John Conyers' HR 676, the Universal Medicare bill.  

This bill will allow Americans to retain their private supplemental insurance if they'd like, but allows the nation to adopt the practices that are working in every other industrialized democracy.  Nurses, doctors, and health care advocates know that we cannot ever solve our healthcare crisis so long as we pay insurance companies to lose hundreds of billions of dollars to overhead...and to deny care when Americans need.

Please join the effort for "Medicare for All," also known as guaranteed healthcare on the single-payer model, by supporting HR 676.  there is more information here and you can look to see if your Congressperson is one of the 92 co-sponsors of the bill.  If not...call her or him, and tell him that the 101,000 lives lost each year to our insurance-industry-dominated healthcare demand that we finally fix this problem.

Everyone in, nobody out.


Join the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee to fight for guaranteed, single-payer healthcare: www.GuaranteedHealthcare.org/blog
by California Nurses Shum on Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 06:09:33 PM EST

Sidebar: Inboarding (none / 0)

http://www.slate.com/id/2195851/pagenum/ all/#page_start

Excerpt

A major cause for E.R. crowding is the hospital practice of boarding inpatients in emergency departments. This happens when patients who come to the E.R. need to be admitted overnight. If there are no inpatient beds in the hospital (or no extra inpatient nurses on duty that day) then the patient stays in the E.R. long past the completion of the initial emergency work. This is what happened to Green, and it has become widespread and common. The problem is that boarding shifts E.R. resources away from the new patients in the waiting room. While E.R. patients wait for inpatient beds, new patients wait longer to see a doctor. As more new patients come, the waits grow. And an E.R. filled with boarding patients and a full waiting room is an unhappy E.R.: The atmosphere is at once static and chaotic. If you or a loved one has waited for hours in an E.R., you know what we mean. The environment can be unsafe and even deadly. A recent study found that critically ill patients who board for more than six hours in the E.R. are 4 percent more likely to die.

In effect, then, E.R. boarding allows hospitals to insulate themselves from the burgeoning needs of the poor. E.R.s are safety nets: By law, we who work in them see any and all patients, regardless of their ability to pay. But as more E.R. beds are devoted to boarders, the E.R. has less space for new patients, which keeps a lid on the number of un- and underinsured. So unless you are having a heart attack and can jump the line, your emergency--though it may still be serious--may wait for so long that you give up and go home. Bad for you, good for the hospital's bottom line. E.R. boarding also tamps down nursing costs, again not to your benefit. Hospitals generally maintain strict patient-to-nurse ratios for inpatients. But many hospitals don't apply the same rules to the E.R. because they can't control the number of patients who come in that way. Sometimes the nursing ratio in the E.R. can be as high as 8-to-1. That's unacceptable in inpatient units, but just stack 'em in the E.R. hallways and suddenly it's OK.


by dearreader on Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 09:13:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: $217 Million Per Hour (none / 0)

Thank you for standing with many of us on this issue.  Being an underinsured American with a chronic health condition, this is something that is close to my heart.  Great post!


-- Dizzy
Proudly cross-posting everything to:
http://www.computerqueen.net/
http://clintonistasforobama.blogspot.com /
by DizzyQueen on Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 06:48:05 PM EST

Re: $217 Million Per Hour (none / 0)

A powerful and impressive post. I shall be spreading the link far and wide.


by jlmccreery on Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 06:59:18 PM EST

Re: $217 Million Per Hour (none / 0)

Oh, yes indeed!  Health care needs to be on the top of the domestic agenda and we can't let it slip away again!

I'm really glad that the CNA is so out front on this issue.  Thanks for the diary and for your hard work.  


by Radiowalla on Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 07:07:05 PM EST

So why are you backing Obama who is against (none / 0)

mandated/universal health care for adults? He's flatly told the Houston Chronicle that he wouldn't consider health care for adults until his second term and only if it worked for kids first! The democratic nominee is against health care.... good choice, Obama  supporters!!!!


by suzieg on Sun Jul 27, 2008 at 05:27:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: So why are you backing Obama who is against (2.00 / 1)

As a matter of fact, I'm backing Hillary Clinton.  I will vote for the Democratic nominee in November because any Democrat will be heads above John McCain on health care and on judicial appointments.


by Radiowalla on Sun Jul 27, 2008 at 08:55:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

We need dialogue w/ Obama (none / 0)

Health care in the US is in crisis, with the average US lifespan now decreasing instead of increasing.  Ignoring or delaying real reform is no longer an option.

We have to keep the message alive.  Electing Obama is the best option, but his commitment to this issue is neither clear nor strong.  Hopefully he'll become confident and experienced enough to realize that substantive and sustainable health care reform policy is the only fix for the looming crisis.  

Having the courage and wisdom to do the right thing comes with experience and hopefully Obama and Congress will get there.  But they need to hear it from rank and file Dems again and again and again and again.


by Betsy McCall on Sun Jul 27, 2008 at 09:37:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: So why are you backing Obama who is against (none / 0)

The purpose of Health Care for America Now is to deliver the next president and Congress an unstoppable mandate to pass health care reform in 2009.


The Seminal :: Independent Media & Politics
by J Ro on Sun Jul 27, 2008 at 12:54:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: $217 Million Per Hour (none / 0)

Great post. Hope to see more from you on this subject as this issue begins to be acted upon.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 10:57:04 PM EST

Crazy Steve King ( R, IA-05) (none / 0)

says we can solve these problems with Health Savings Accounts. My response is here:

http://www.bleedingheartland.com/showDia ry.do?diaryId=1736


See if Saxby Chambliss is helping you.
by desmoinesdem on Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 11:30:34 PM EST

Health savings accounts are a buch of crap. i.e. (none / 0)

My husband and I pay over $22,200 yearly just in premiums with mine being purchased through my state's health risk pool which costs close to $17,000 + $1,000 deductible + $3,000 co-pay and goes up on average 5.7% twice a year - how are we expected to save the extra $22,200 for the next year premiums - it's all fine and dandy for healthy young people but as you reach your 50's problems start to creep up such as bad knees from years of running to keep in shape and hopefully you'll not be afflicted with a serious disease because, if it does, kiss your financial security good-bye!


by suzieg on Sun Jul 27, 2008 at 05:34:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Crazy Steve King ( R, IA-05) (none / 0)

Health savings accounts are a scam.


The Seminal :: Independent Media & Politics
by J Ro on Sun Jul 27, 2008 at 12:54:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.